(2021) “Science Education and the Pandemic, 1 Year On: Emergence of New Conceptual Tools and Re-calibration of Existing Educational Approaches.”, Sci Educ (Dordr). 1-4.
(2020) ““Evaluate what I was taught, not what you expected me to know”: evaluating students’ arguments based on science teachers’ adaptations to Toulmin’s argument pattern”, Journal of Science Teacher Education. 1-19.
(2020) “Assessment of practical science in high stakes examinations: a qualitative analysis of high performing English-speaking countries”, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION.
(2020) “Science education in the era of a pandemic: How can history, philosophy and sociology of science contribute to education for understanding and solving the Covid-19 crisis?”, Science and Education. 1-3.
(2020) “The "tipping point" for educational research: The role of pre-service science teachers’ epistemic beliefs in evaluating the professional utility of educational research”, Teaching and Teacher Education. 90 103033-103033.
(2019) “Investigating the diversity of scientific methods in high-stakes chemistry examinations in England”, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION. 41(16) 2201-2217.
(2019) “Measuring informal STEM learning supports across contexts and time”, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEM EDUCATION. 6(1)
(2019) “Synthesis of epistemic cognition: Greene, J.A., Sandoval, W.A., and Bråten, I. (Eds.) (2016), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition, Abingdon, Routledge, ISBN: 9781138013421, 530 pages, £97.99 (Paperback)”, SCIENCE & EDUCATION. 28(6-7) 819-821.
(2019) “Understanding argumentation about socio-scientific issues on energy: A quantitative study with primary pre-service teachers in Spain”, RESEARCH IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION. 36(4) 463-483.
(2018) “Abandoning patchwork approaches to nature of science in science education”, Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education. 17(1) 46-52.
(2018) “Drawing nature of science in pre-service science teacher education: Epistemic insight through visual representations”, Research in Science Education.
(2018) “Looking at the social aspects of nature of science in science education through a new lens”, SCIENCE & EDUCATION. 27(5-6) 457-478.
(2017) “Argumentation in science education as an evolving concept: Following the object of activity”, LEARNING CULTURE AND SOCIAL INTERACTION. 14 51-66.
(2017) “Beyond rote learning in organic chemistry: the infusion and impact of argumentation in tertiary education”, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION. 39(9) 1154-1172.
(2017) “The pedagogy of argumentation in science education: Science teachers’ instructional practices”, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION. 39(11) 1443-1464.
(2016) “Argumentation in science education as a systemic activity: An activity-theoretical perspective”, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH. 79 150-166.
(2016) “Investigating students' engagement in epistemic and narrative practices of chemistry in the context of a story on gas behavior”, CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE. 17(3) 523-531.
(2016) “From FRA to RFN: How the Family Resemblance Approach Can Be Transformed for Science Curriculum Analysis on Nature of Science”, SCIENCE & EDUCATION. 25(9-10) 1115-1133.
(2016) “Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education”, SCIENCE & EDUCATION. 25(1-2) 147-164.
(2016) “Scientific argumentation and deliberative democracy: an incompatible mix in school science?”, Theory into Practice. 55(4) 302-310.
(2015) “The role of visual representations in scientific practices: from conceptual understanding and knowledge generation to ‘seeing’ how science works”, International Journal of STEM Education. 2(1)
(2015) “Research trends on argumentation in science education: a journal content analysis from 1998–2014”, International Journal of STEM Education. 2(1)
(2015) “Introduction to the Focus on ... Scientific Practices”, SCIENCE EDUCATION. 99(6) 1023-1025.
(2014) “Regaining focus in Irish Junior Cycle Science: potential new directions for curriculum and assessment on Nature of Science”, IRISH EDUCATIONAL STUDIES. 33(4) 335-350.
(2014) “Adaptation of two argumentation tests into Turkish”, Elementary Education Online. 13(3) 1014-1032.
(2014) “Science curriculum reform in South Africa: Lessons for professional development from research on argumentation in science education”, EDUCATION AS CHANGE. 18 S33-S46.
(2013) “The Effect of Argumentative Task Goal on the Quality of Argumentative Discourse”, SCIENCE EDUCATION. 97(4) 497-523.
(2013) “Integrating Epistemological Perspectives on Chemistry in Chemical Education: The Cases of Concept Duality, Chemical Language, and Structural Explanations”, SCIENCE & EDUCATION. 22(7) 1741-1755.
(2013) “Interactions of Economics of Science and Science Education: Investigating the Implications for Science Teaching and Learning”, SCIENCE & EDUCATION. 22(10) 2405-2425.
(2013) “Philosophy, Chemistry and Education: An Introduction”, SCIENCE & EDUCATION. 22(7) 1559-1562.
(2013) “The Nature of Pre-service Science Teachers' Argumentation in Inquiry-oriented Laboratory Context”, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION. 35(15) 2559-2586.
(2011) “Critical Appraisal of Physical Science as a Human Enterprise: Dynamics of Scientific Progress”, SCIENCE & EDUCATION. 20(3-4) 397-399.
(2009) “Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education”, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION. 31(1) 147-149.
(2009) “BEYOND PHILOSOPHICAL CONFUSION: ESTABLISHING THE ROLE OF PHILOSOPHY OF CHEMISTRY IN CHEMICAL EDUCATION RESEARCH”, JOURNAL OF BALTIC SCIENCE EDUCATION. 8(1) 5-14.
(2008) “Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge”, JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING. 45(1) 101-131.
(2008) “Introduction to special issue: Science studies and science education”, SCIENCE EDUCATION. 92(3) 385-388.
(2007) “Developing epistemologically empowered teachers: Examining the role of philosophy of chemistry in teacher education”, Science and Education. 16(9-10) 975-989.
(2007) “Breaking the law: Promoting domain-specificity in chemical education in the context of arguing about the periodic law”, Foundations of Chemistry. 9(3) 247-263.
(2006) “Guest editorial: Science studies and science education call for papers deadline: March 31, 2007”, SCIENCE EDUCATION. 90(6) 961-964.
(2006) “Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom”, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION. 28(2-3) 235-260.
(2006) “Learning to teach argumentation: Case studies of pre-service secondary science teachers”, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2(2) 1-14.
(2005) “Applying the philosophical concept of reduction to the chemistry of water: Implications for chemical education”, Science and Education. 14(2) 161-171.
(2005) “Learning science through a historical approach: Does it affect the attitudes of non-science-oriented students towards science?”, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 3(3) 485-507.
(2004) “TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse”, SCIENCE EDUCATION. 88(6) 915-933.
(2004) “Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science”, JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING. 41(10) 994-1020.
(2004) “Interdisciplinary characterizations of models and the nature of chemical knowledge in the classroom”, Studies in Science Education. 40(1) 105-138.
(2004) “Learning from international frameworks for assessment: EAL descriptors in Australia and the USA”, Language Testing. 21(3) 409-431.
(2002) “Improving science education: the contribution of research”, BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL. 28(5) 738-739.
(2001) “Philosophy of chemistry: An emerging field with implications for chemistry education”, Science and Education. 10(6) 581-593.
(2001) “Understanding science lessons”, BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL. 27(5) 660-661.
(1995) “Nitrite effects on formation of volatile oxidation products from triolein.”, Journal of food science. 60(5) 946-948.
“Science and religious education teachers’ views of argumentation and its teaching”, Research in Science Education.
“Beyond hypothesis testing: Investigating the diversity of scientific methods in science teachers' understanding”, Science and Education.
“An investigation into secondary teachers’ views of argumentation in science and religious education”, Journal of Beliefs and Values: studies in religion and education.
“Designing practical science assessments in England: students’ engagement and perceptions”, Research in Science and Technological Education.
“The nature of STEM disciplines in the science education standards documents from the USA, Korea and Taiwan: Focusing on disciplinary aims, values and practices”, Science and Education. 29(4) 899-927.
“Perceptions of nature of science emerging in group discussions: A comparative account of pre-service teachers from Turkey and England”, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.
“Assessment of practical science in high stakes examinations: a qualitative analysis of high performing English-speaking countries”, International Journal of Science Education.
“Toulmin’s argument pattern as a “horizon of possibilities” in the study of argumentation in science education”, Cultural Studies of Science Education.
“STEM and Gender at University: focusing on Irish undergraduate female students’ perceptions”, Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education.
“Argumentation in science and religion: match and/or mismatch when applied in teaching and learning?”, Journal of Education for Teaching. 1-3.
“Editorial vision for Science and Education”, Science & Education.
“Investigating coherence about nature of science in the science curriculum documents: Taiwan as a case study”, Science and Education.
“Contributions of the family resemblance approach to nature of science in science education: A review of emergent research and development”, Science and Education.
“STEM and gender at university: focusing on Irish undergraduate female students’ perceptions”, Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education.
“STeP into Science Project: Engaging Students, Teachers and Parents in Debates”, Chemistry in Action.
“Understanding aims and values of science: Developments in the junior cycle specifications on nature of science and pre-service science teachers’ views in Ireland”, Irish Educational Studies.
“Reconceptualised family resemblance approach to nature of science in pre-service science teacher education”, International Journal of Science Education.
“Developing assessments for the next generation science standards”, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice.