About

The Critical Digital Education Research Group (CDER) takes a broadly sociological approach to exploring the role of technology in learning and education nationally and internationally. We are a methodologically diverse group, employing varied approaches to capturing all aspects of education, from everyday classroom practices to global policy impacts, with a commitment to creative digital methods as critique.

The group is convened by Rebecca Eynon.

Our research is funded by multiple organisations including the British Academy, DFID, the Dieter Schwarz Foundation, the European Commission, the ESRC, the Gates Foundation, John Fell Fund, the British Educational Research Association, Hitotsubashi University, the Nominet Trust, the Oxford IT Innovations Fund, Goldman Sachs Gives, Google, the Wellcome Trust and Wikipedia.

Our activities build upon the past work of the Learning and New Technologies Research Group (LNTRG) that was based at the department from 2010-2021. Our four areas of focus are: social justice and inequality, cultural political economy, data intensive governance and policy, and participatory and sustainable futures.

Research Themes

Students

This theme is concerned with the ways digital technologies produce or exacerbate existing social and educational inequity. In contrast to the instrumental value of innovation, we make visible the complex economic, cultural, and political injustices that can arise in the development and use of technology. See, for example, our EdTech Equity and Tech for Good projects.

Students

This theme draws attention to the economic and geo-political dynamics that shape the everyday uses of technology in classrooms. Our work charts the ways that an array of political and commercial actors have increasing power in influencing policy and practice, where commercial interests can stand in for public concerns. See, for example, our AI in Education Policy project.

Students

This theme examines the ways trace data, algorithms, and ‘AI’ are increasing ordering and providing instrumental rationales for education and wider society, displacing expertise, normalising surveillance, generating new kinds of authoritative knowledge, and shaping forms of policy making. See, for example, our work that has unpacked the ‘black box’ of AI in education, examined the ways data-driven technologies reinstate behaviourist pedagogies, and found disconnections between the governance of trace data and ethical debates in the field.

Students

This theme develops alternative visions and methods for ethical, inclusive, democratic, environmentally sustainable and community-driven education and technology. Through engaging diverse constituents and marginalised groups across the globe, this work aims to unpack the power relations at play in the design and production of EdTech. See, for example, our  Teaching for Digital Citizenship  and Mapping Participatory Co-design projects .

Impact

Study with us